Thursday June 22, 2017 08:39 AM EST


Michigan Court Accommodates Turban

By Anju Kaur, SikhNN staff writer, Washington Bureau
Posted: Friday, September 13, 2013 | 10:13 pm

Hardeep Singh was asked to remove his "hat" or leave the courtroom. He left.

Photo Source: United Sikhs

When Hardeep Singh of Battle Creek, Michigan, sat down in a Kalamazoo County courtroom, the judge ordered him to remove his "hat."

Courtrooms are the domains of the judges. What is appropriate courtroom conduct is up to the judge. It is customary for most judges not to allow hats.

“But most are not as rigid,” said Manmeet Singh, staff attorney for United Sikhs, a New York-based advocacy group.

“Judges should be accommodating, they are the givers of justice and should be even more (sensitive) than the common person on street. He should not be asking for it to be removed.”

Hardeep Singh was accompanying a friend to his court hearing in the Kalamazoo County Probate Court on Oct. 16, when suddenly, while seated in the courtroom, the judge asked him to remove his “hat.”

According to a Sept. 11 news release by United Sikhs, all attempts to explain that the Sikh turban is not a hat, that it is an article of faith and an inseparable part of the Sikh identity were halted by the judge.

Another couple seated in the courtroom tried to defend Hardeep Singh, but their efforts also failed. The judge asked him to either remove his “hat” or leave the courtroom.

“As any devout Sikh would have done, (Hardeep Singh) chose to leave the courtroom,” the news release said.

“Not each and every courtroom has a (non-discrimination) policy,” Hardeep Singh told SikhNN. United Sikhs filed a civil rights complaint with the Department of Justice. And with the assistance of the US Attorney’s office for the western district of Michigan, the court’s existing policy was amended to allow persons wearing religious head coverings into the courtrooms.

“It’s just few lines,” Manmeet Singh added. “But it will benefit not only Sikhs, but Jews, Muslims or any minority faith with religious attire.”

The new non-discrimination policy is now posted inside and outside the courthouse, and on its and Web site.

Judge Donald R. Halstead, who recently retired, wrote a letter of apology last month.

“It was never my intention to discriminate against you or your religion and has never been my practice to discriminate against anyone on the basis of religious faith,” he said on Aug. 1. “I failed to properly understand the significance of your dastar/turban and for the Impact of my actions, I sincerely apologize.”

Halstead also notified United Sikhs that the court has trained its staff on the new non-discrimination policy related to religious attire and headwear. The court also clarified its complaint process. If anyone should feel discriminated against while at the court, a complaint form is readily accessible.

“I am confident that such actions will ensure your experience is not felt or shared by others.”




more stories...


Vaisakhi: Birth of Guru Nanak and of the Khalsa

Sunday, Apr 13, 2014 | 11:56 PM

Status of Sikhs in the Army

Wednesday, Feb 26, 2014 | 10:56 PM

Maj. Kalsi Asks For US Military to Open Doors to Sikhs

Wednesday, Jun 12, 2013 | 10:40 AM

American Sikh Congressional Caucus

Sunday, Apr 28, 2013 | 10:13 PM

Sponsored Links

Reach Us
  • Call Us
  • Mail Us
    Sikh News Network
    National Press Building
    529 14th Street, NW
    Suite 950
    Washington, D.C. 20045
  • Contact Us

© 2001-2013 Sikh News Network, LLC

Help |  Contact Us

Site designed and maintained by Akal Purakh Technologies
This page is best viewed in Internet Explorer 9, Firefox and Chrome